Dr Karl needs to look at raw data rather than manipulated grant seeking publications.
Listen to his very biased BBC Up all Night Q/A sessions to find that he barely answers
any questions successfully and BBC bias does not allow Climate skeptics on the programme.
I would like to ask him.....
Where are the catastrophic sea level rises? [even Al Gore has spent millions on a seafront property recently]
How come some Coral Reefs are regenerating and how does a clean water seeking structure appear off the mouth of the Amazon in water so thick with pollution that only modern radar and sonar equipment has revealed a thriving reef as big as Australia's much vaunted Great Barrier Reef?
Where is the iceless North Pole? The Chinese Navy hundreds of years ago found the North West Passage in their giant junks and today we have Cruise Ships attempting to do the same thing but with massive ice breakers to lead the way. Is that progress? Why was there less ice all those centuries ago?
Where are the weather conditions any worse than they were hundreds of years ago , before the Industrial Revolution?
If CO2 is so harmful how come all plants would grow healthier in higher CIO2 concentrations?
How come 400 ppm is a tipping point? [Whatever "tipping point' means in the the Real World]
Why does he feed the Media with doom laden forecasts? [24 hour Breaking News is a curse that should be eliminated IMHO]
Why is he not promoting Thorium powered Reactors as a stable power source? Instead of trumpeting the scam of so called Renewable Energy Wind Farms? Which kill thousands of migrating birds and spoil Mother Nature's scenery?
We are Carbon based life forms, we can tolerate CO2 levels of 5-10,000 Parts per Million [As do Nuclear Submarine sailors for months at a time] with no ill effects and yet sad housewives are persuaded to buy underpowered vacuum cleaners and washing machines to cut CO2 emissions by 0,1ºC over 100 years!!!!!!! According to computer models none of which can match actual data - always way on the high side....
I would like to see people Googling more historical weather reports [from Monks and Scholars way back to the dawn of the written word]
Take the Great Storm of 1603 as a case in point. It was so much worse than the trifling October 1987
storm in the South of England.
The 1603 storm killed hundreds of people, blew down millions more trees than the '87 one and even blew a Royal Navy Gunboat from the Thames Estuary all the way to Scandinavia! And it capsized many thousands of river and sea going vessels....
Anyone else think that the human brain loves conspiracy theories despite cold hard facts and why have we had in the past money grabbing schemes now regarded as utterly stupid such as Tulip Trading, Fools Gold, The South Sea Bubble, Papal Indulgences, Witchcraft, Astrology, and so many more....
Onwards and Upwards,
Brian Johnson Surrey Hills UK
Voting LEAVE today. June 23rd The day the UK left the dying ship that is the EU
